WSU Energy Program Logo
Bonneville Power Administration Logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Database
      • Browse
      • Energy Systems
        • Building Envelope
        • Electronics
        • HVAC
        • Irrigation
        • Lighting
        • Motors & Drives
        • Multiple Energy Systems
        • Power Systems
        • Process Loads & Appliances
        • Refrigeration
        • Transportation
        • Water Heating
      • Sector
        • Agricultural
        • Commercial
        • Industrial
        • Residential
        • Utility
  • TAG Portal
      • 2017 Residential Lighting TAG (#14)
      • 2016 Multifamily Building TAG (#13)
      • 2015-1 Commercial HVAC TAG (#11)
      • 2014 Residential Building TAG (#10)
      • 2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)
      • 2013 Information Technology TAG (#8)
      • 2013 ALCS TAG (#7)
      • 2012 Smart Thermostat TAG (#6)
      • 2012 LED Lighting TAG (#5)
      • 2011 Energy Management TAG (#4)
      • 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)
      • 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
      • 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)
  • Webinars
    • Webinar Archives
  • Glossary
>

Summary

Desiccant-Enhanced Hybrid Evaporative Air Pre-Cooler

Indirect Evaporative Cooling System: Desiccant Pre-Cooler with Direct Expansion Chiller vs. Direct Expansion Chiller

Combining the basic indirect evaporative cooler with a desiccant pre-stage allows for evaporative coolers to operate efficiently under higher-humidity conditions than would be normally possible.

Synopsis:

Based upon the same basic principles that allowed humans to cool their homes using evaporating water for thousands of years, evaporative coolers change sensible heat within air into latent heat contained within evaporated water. This principle has been exploited through so-called ‘Swamp Coolers’ which evaporate water directly into the stream of air which is directed into the conditioned space (called the product stream). This has certain drawbacks, however, including the possibility of increasing moisture content in the product stream to an uncomfortable level, as well a tendency to produce musty smells in the conditioned air (both contributing to the term “swamp cooler”).  

More recently, coolers have been commercialized which use “indirect” evaporative cooling very effectively. While the basic cooling mechanism in these devices continues to be evaporated water into a stream of warm air, in an indirect setup this evaporation stream is kept physically separated from the product stream air going into the conditioned space. Indirect evaporative cooling technologies using the patented, and U.S. Department of Energy (US DOE) tested, Maisotsenko Cycle have been demonstrated to reduce energy consumption by up to 90% versus traditional direct expansion refrigerator air conditioners, without introducing moisture or smells to the product stream. These indirect evaporative coolers, however, are limited geographically operating most efficiently in “high and dry” climates, and somewhat less effectively in “low and dry” climates, and not effectively at all in high humidity areas.

Combining the basic indirect evaporative cooler with a desiccant pre-stage allows for evaporative coolers to operate efficiently under higher-humidity conditions than would be normally possible. This hybrid technology is being employed successfully in Japan. A desiccant/indirect evaporative cooler is often used in conjunction with facilities’ process heating, where the waste heat is used to dry the desiccant in the HVAC unit.

Energy Savings: 25%
Energy Savings Rating: Concept validated:  What's this?
LevelStatusDescription
1Concept not validatedClaims of energy savings may not be credible due to lack of documentation or validation by unbiased experts.
2Concept validated:An unbiased expert has validated efficiency concepts through technical review and calculations based on engineering principles.
3Limited assessmentAn unbiased expert has measured technology characteristics and factors of energy use through one or more tests in typical applications with a clear baseline.
4Extensive assessmentAdditional testing in relevant applications and environments has increased knowledge of performance across a broad range of products, applications, and system conditions.
5Comprehensive analysisResults of lab and field tests have been used to develop methods for reliable prediction of performance across the range of intended applications.
6Approved measureProtocols for technology application are established and approved.

Status:

Details

Desiccant-Enhanced Hybrid Evaporative Air Pre-Cooler

Indirect Evaporative Cooling System: Desiccant Pre-Cooler with Direct Expansion Chiller vs. Direct Expansion Chiller

Combining the basic indirect evaporative cooler with a desiccant pre-stage allows for evaporative coolers to operate efficiently under higher-humidity conditions than would be normally possible.
Item ID: 49
Sector: Commercial
Energy System: HVAC--Other HVAC Systems
Technical Advisory Group: 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)

Synopsis:

Based upon the same basic principles that allowed humans to cool their homes using evaporating water for thousands of years, evaporative coolers change sensible heat within air into latent heat contained within evaporated water. This principle has been exploited through so-called ‘Swamp Coolers’ which evaporate water directly into the stream of air which is directed into the conditioned space (called the product stream). This has certain drawbacks, however, including the possibility of increasing moisture content in the product stream to an uncomfortable level, as well a tendency to produce musty smells in the conditioned air (both contributing to the term “swamp cooler”).  

More recently, coolers have been commercialized which use “indirect” evaporative cooling very effectively. While the basic cooling mechanism in these devices continues to be evaporated water into a stream of warm air, in an indirect setup this evaporation stream is kept physically separated from the product stream air going into the conditioned space. Indirect evaporative cooling technologies using the patented, and U.S. Department of Energy (US DOE) tested, Maisotsenko Cycle have been demonstrated to reduce energy consumption by up to 90% versus traditional direct expansion refrigerator air conditioners, without introducing moisture or smells to the product stream. These indirect evaporative coolers, however, are limited geographically operating most efficiently in “high and dry” climates, and somewhat less effectively in “low and dry” climates, and not effectively at all in high humidity areas.

Combining the basic indirect evaporative cooler with a desiccant pre-stage allows for evaporative coolers to operate efficiently under higher-humidity conditions than would be normally possible. This hybrid technology is being employed successfully in Japan. A desiccant/indirect evaporative cooler is often used in conjunction with facilities’ process heating, where the waste heat is used to dry the desiccant in the HVAC unit.

Baseline Example:

Baseline Description: DX cooling w/reheat
Baseline Energy Use: 6.6 kWh per year per square foot

Comments:

The 2009 Commercial Building Stock Assessment gives the actual electrical building energy use index(EUI) for various types of heating and cooling systems (Table D-EA5). Office buildings with electric heating and cooling have an EUI of 20.1 kWh/sf/year. Office buildings with no electric heating or cooling use only 8.2 kWh/sf/year, indicating that the combined HVAC heating and cooling energy use is 11.9 kWh/sf/year.  For all commercial buildings, the corresponding numbers are 19.9 and 9.4 kWh/sf/year, respectively for a heating and cooling use of 10.5 kWh/sf-year.

Commercial buildings with electric cooling and with no electric heating have an electrical EUI of 16.8 kWh/sf-year (14.8 for office buildings).  This indicates that the heating load for all categories of commercial buildings is about 3.1 kWh/sf-year (19.9-16.8) with a cooling load of about 7.4 kWh/sf-year (10.5-3.1).  The corresponding electrical EUI for office buildings with electric cooling with no electrical heating is14.8 kWh/sf-year which indicates a space heating load of 5.3 kWh/sf-year with a corresponding cooling load of 6.6 kWh/sf-year (11.9-5.3).  

Since this technology can be applied to many types of office buildings, a baseline cooling energy use of 6.6 kWh/sf/year is assumed (NEEA,12/21/2009).

Manufacturer's Energy Savings Claims:

"Typical" Savings: 45%
Savings Range: From 30% to 60%

Comments:

(Munters, 3013) claims 50% less energy than mechanical cooling, baseline unknown
(Westaire, 2013) claims over 70% less energy than mechanical cooling, baseline unknown

Best Estimate of Energy Savings:

"Typical" Savings: 25%
Low and High Energy Savings: 25% to 90%
Energy Savings Reliability: 2 - Concept validated

Comments:

Energy savings depend on the climate.  Please see page 37 of (Kozubal, 2013)

Energy Use of Emerging Technology:
5 kWh per square foot per year What's this?

Energy Use of an Emerging Technology is based upon the following algorithm.

Baseline Energy Use - (Baseline Energy Use * Best Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings.))

Technical Potential:
Units: square foot
Potential number of units replaced by this technology: 118,334,000
Comments:

This technology could technically be used for virtually any commercial building served by a rooftop unit with cooling.  As performance data is not available for Northwest locations, we are using the total conditioned space of the entire commercial building stock in the Northwest that is in hot and dry climate zones 2 and 3 and served by rooftop units (RTUs). The numbers are taken from preliminary updated numbers from the 2013 update to the Commercial Building Stock Assessment (CBSA) using the estimates for 2014 (before the update was completed -- from early January, 2014) multiplied times the percentage of commercial space that is conditioned based on the 2009 CBSA, and by the percentage of area served by RTUs according to the 2009 CBSA  (This analysis yields a total of 924,331,000 sf, see Table below).  The 2009 CBSA notes that 12.3% of the commercial building stock is located in climate zone #2 while an additional 1.5% is in climate zone #3 (Table C-GB-17, for 13.8% of the conditioned sf).  It also notes that 1% of the conditioned space employs evaporative cooling (Table C-HS-13).  This will be subtracted from the conditioned spaces in zones 2 and 3 to yield:   0.128 x 924,331,000 = 118,314,368 sf.   The technical potential would increase significantly if demonstration projects verify that significant energy savings can be obtained in Western WA and OR.


                                            Commercial Space Served by Rooftop Units in the Northwest

 Total Floor space   %Conditioned   Conditioned space   % RTUs  Area served by RTU (s.f.)
 Source   (NEEA, 2014)   (NEEA, 2009 App C)   (NEEA, 2009 Pg 23) 
3,118,000,000 84.70% 2,640,946,000 35% 924,331,000
Regional Technical Potential:
0.20 TWh per year
22 aMW
What's this?

Regional Technical Potential of an Emerging Technology is calculated as follows:

Baseline Energy Use * Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings) * Technical Potential (potential number of units replaced by the Emerging Technology)

First Cost: Currently no data available.

Cost Effectiveness:

Simple payback, new construction (years): N/A

Simple payback, retrofit (years): N/A

What's this?

Cost Effectiveness is calculated using baseline energy use, best estimate of typical energy savings, and first cost. It does not account for factors such as impacts on O&M costs (which could be significant if product life is greatly extended) or savings of non-electric fuels such as natural gas. Actual overall cost effectiveness could be significantly different based on these other factors.

Reference and Citations:

Henry Nasution, 11/11/2010. Maisotsenko Cycle
Automotive Development Centre

Eric Kozubal, 09/30/2013. Desiccant Enhanced Evaporative Air-Conditioning (DEVap): Evaluation of a New Concept in Ultra Efficient Air Conditioning
National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Eric Kozubal, 07/01/2012. NREL’s Energy-Saving Technology for Air Conditioning Cuts Peak Power Loads Without Using Harmful Refrigerants
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Special Notes: As of this publishing, "NREL welcomes the participation of commercial partners that could now help move this technology to market."

NEEA, 01/01/2014. Total Pacific Northwest Building Stock Based on Preliminary Numbers from the 2013 Update to the CBSA
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance

CADMUS, 12/21/2009. Northwest Commercial Building Stock Assessment (CBSA): Final Report
Prepared by the CADMUS Group for the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance

Rank & Scores

Desiccant-Enhanced Hybrid Evaporative Air Pre-Cooler

2009 HVAC TAG (#2)


Technical Advisory Group: 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
TAG Ranking:
Average TAG Rating:
TAG Ranking Date:
TAG Rating Commentary:

Contact
Copyright 2023 Washington State University
disclaimer and privacy policies

Bonneville Power Administration Logo