WSU Energy Program Logo
Bonneville Power Administration Logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Database
      • Browse
      • Energy Systems
        • Building Envelope
        • Electronics
        • HVAC
        • Irrigation
        • Lighting
        • Motors & Drives
        • Multiple Energy Systems
        • Power Systems
        • Process Loads & Appliances
        • Refrigeration
        • Transportation
        • Water Heating
      • Sector
        • Agricultural
        • Commercial
        • Industrial
        • Residential
        • Utility
  • TAG Portal
      • 2017 Residential Lighting TAG (#14)
      • 2016 Multifamily Building TAG (#13)
      • 2015-1 Commercial HVAC TAG (#11)
      • 2014 Residential Building TAG (#10)
      • 2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)
      • 2013 Information Technology TAG (#8)
      • 2013 ALCS TAG (#7)
      • 2012 Smart Thermostat TAG (#6)
      • 2012 LED Lighting TAG (#5)
      • 2011 Energy Management TAG (#4)
      • 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)
      • 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
      • 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)
  • Webinars
    • Webinar Archives
  • Glossary
>

Summary

Low Temp Supply Air to Reduce Volumetric Flow Rate

Cooling System Air Supply: Lower-Temperature  to Reduce Air Flow vs. Standard-Temperature

Lower design supply temperatures for cooling reduce the air volume required to meet loads and reduces fan energy, duct sizing, and potentially first-installed cost.

Synopsis:

Traditionally, the supply air temperature from an HVAC air handler is set to 55°. By lowering the supply air temperature to 45° or 50°, the volume of supply air can be greatly reduced, which saves a lot of electric fan energy. It also allows the ductwork, diffusers, terminal units and other distribution components to be reduced in size, which saves on the installation cost. However, if implementing this strategy requires higher head pressure for the compressor, this can reduce the efficiency of the compressor, so this tradeoff will need to be quantified and compared in cost and energy savings before implementing the design change.

Energy Savings: 2%
Energy Savings Rating: Concept validated:  What's this?
LevelStatusDescription
1Concept not validatedClaims of energy savings may not be credible due to lack of documentation or validation by unbiased experts.
2Concept validated:An unbiased expert has validated efficiency concepts through technical review and calculations based on engineering principles.
3Limited assessmentAn unbiased expert has measured technology characteristics and factors of energy use through one or more tests in typical applications with a clear baseline.
4Extensive assessmentAdditional testing in relevant applications and environments has increased knowledge of performance across a broad range of products, applications, and system conditions.
5Comprehensive analysisResults of lab and field tests have been used to develop methods for reliable prediction of performance across the range of intended applications.
6Approved measureProtocols for technology application are established and approved.

Status:

Details

Low Temp Supply Air to Reduce Volumetric Flow Rate

Cooling System Air Supply: Lower-Temperature  to Reduce Air Flow vs. Standard-Temperature

Lower design supply temperatures for cooling reduce the air volume required to meet loads and reduces fan energy, duct sizing, and potentially first-installed cost.
Item ID: 203
Sector: Commercial
Energy System: HVAC--Sensors & Controls
Technical Advisory Group: 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)

Synopsis:

Traditionally, the supply air temperature from an HVAC air handler is set to 55°. By lowering the supply air temperature to 45° or 50°, the volume of supply air can be greatly reduced, which saves a lot of electric fan energy. It also allows the ductwork, diffusers, terminal units and other distribution components to be reduced in size, which saves on the installation cost. However, if implementing this strategy requires higher head pressure for the compressor, this can reduce the efficiency of the compressor, so this tradeoff will need to be quantified and compared in cost and energy savings before implementing the design change.

Baseline Example:

Baseline Description: Supply Air Temperature at 55 degrees
Baseline Energy Use: 6.6 kWh per year per square foot

Comments:

The 2009 Commercial Building Stock Assessment gives the actual electrical building energy use index(EUI) for various types of heating and cooling systems (Table D-EA5). Office buildings with electric heating and cooling have an EUI of 20.1 kWh/sf/year. Office buildings with no electric heating or cooling use only 8.2 kWh/sf/year, indicating that the combined HVAC heating and cooling energy use is 11.9 kWh/sf/year.  For all commercial buildings, the corresponding numbers are 19.9 and 9.4 kWh/sf/year, respectively for a heating and cooling use of 10.5 kWh/sf-year.

Commercial buildings with electric cooling and with no electric heating have an electrical EUI of 16.8 kWh/sf-year (14.8 for office buildings).  This indicates that the heating load for all categories of commercial buildings is about 3.1 kWh/sf-year (19.9-16.8) with a cooling load of about 7.4 kWh/sf-year (10.5-3.1).  The corresponding electrical EUI for office buildings with electric cooling with no electrical heating is14.8 kWh/sf-year which indicates a space heating load of 5.3 kWh/sf-year with a corresponding cooling load of 6.6 kWh/sf-year (11.9-5.3).  

Since this technology can be applied to many types of office buildings, a baseline cooling energy use of 6.6 kWh/sf/year is assumed (NEEA,12/21/2009).

Manufacturer's Energy Savings Claims:

Comments:

This is a strategy therefore there are no manufacturers claims.

Best Estimate of Energy Savings:

"Typical" Savings: 2%
Low and High Energy Savings: 1% to 3%
Energy Savings Reliability: 2 - Concept validated

Comments:

There are a number of trade-offs in analyzing the energy benefits of lower chilled water temperatures. Fan energy and pumping energy savings will be offset by higher chiller energy use. The optimum temperature will depend on the application and is best considered as part of an integrated design approach for a new building. This ET is for climates that can operate cooler temperatures without condensing in the ductwork and at the grilles. Considering 16 different combination of options in an office building (McQuay International, 2013) the best savings was 3% and the optimum result was 2% better.

Energy Use of Emerging Technology:
6.5 kWh per square foot per year What's this?

Energy Use of an Emerging Technology is based upon the following algorithm.

Baseline Energy Use - (Baseline Energy Use * Best Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings.))

Technical Potential:
Units: square foot
Potential number of units replaced by this technology: 171,209,380
Comments:

This design strategy applies to new large commercial buildings with chilled water systems. For existing buildings, the characteristics of the existing HVAC system limit potential savings.

For the purposes of this analysis CBSA data can be used to make projections of commercial building square footage ( NEEA, 01/1/2014). Using a 1% annual growth rate and 2% replacement rate (3% total), we estimate that over 10 years new construction and major renovations will be 34% of existing commercial square footage: 3,118,000,000 * 0.34 = 1,060,120,000 sf. Applying market shares for existing buildings for conditioned space (85%) and chilled water systems (19%) results in: 1,060,120,000 * 0.85 *0.19 =  171,209,380 sf.


 

Regional Technical Potential:
0.02 TWh per year
3 aMW
What's this?

Regional Technical Potential of an Emerging Technology is calculated as follows:

Baseline Energy Use * Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings) * Technical Potential (potential number of units replaced by the Emerging Technology)

First Cost: Currently no data available.

Cost Effectiveness:

Simple payback, new construction (years): N/A

Simple payback, retrofit (years): N/A

What's this?

Cost Effectiveness is calculated using baseline energy use, best estimate of typical energy savings, and first cost. It does not account for factors such as impacts on O&M costs (which could be significant if product life is greatly extended) or savings of non-electric fuels such as natural gas. Actual overall cost effectiveness could be significantly different based on these other factors.

Reference and Citations:

NEEA, 01/01/2014. Total Pacific Northwest Building Stock Based on Preliminary Numbers from the 2013 Update to the CBSA
Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance

A. Bhatia, 01/19/2013. Air Conditioning Psychrometrics
Continuing Education and Development, Inc.

McQuay International, 03/26/2013. Why Change the Chilled Water Temperature Range?
Engineering System Solutions

R. Parameshwaran, 01/10/2013. Optimization of Energy Conservation Potential for VAV Air Conditioning System using Fuzzy based Genetic Alogorithm
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology

Rank & Scores

Low Temp Supply Air to Reduce Volumetric Flow Rate

2009 HVAC TAG (#2)


Technical Advisory Group: 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
TAG Ranking:
Average TAG Rating:
TAG Ranking Date:
TAG Rating Commentary:

Contact
Copyright 2023 Washington State University
disclaimer and privacy policies

Bonneville Power Administration Logo