WSU Energy Program Logo
Bonneville Power Administration Logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Database
      • Browse
      • Energy Systems
        • Building Envelope
        • Electronics
        • HVAC
        • Irrigation
        • Lighting
        • Motors & Drives
        • Multiple Energy Systems
        • Power Systems
        • Process Loads & Appliances
        • Refrigeration
        • Transportation
        • Water Heating
      • Sector
        • Agricultural
        • Commercial
        • Industrial
        • Residential
        • Utility
  • TAG Portal
      • 2017 Residential Lighting TAG (#14)
      • 2016 Multifamily Building TAG (#13)
      • 2015-1 Commercial HVAC TAG (#11)
      • 2014 Residential Building TAG (#10)
      • 2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)
      • 2013 Information Technology TAG (#8)
      • 2013 ALCS TAG (#7)
      • 2012 Smart Thermostat TAG (#6)
      • 2012 LED Lighting TAG (#5)
      • 2011 Energy Management TAG (#4)
      • 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)
      • 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
      • 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)
  • Webinars
    • Webinar Archives
  • Glossary
>

Summary

LED Downlights (Can) for Residential Retrofit Applications

Downlight Lighting: LED vs. Incandescent, Halogen, CFL

Downlighting using LED technology to provide very efficient, very directional, instant-on, and often dimmable lighting to replace CFLs and incandescent lamps for “can” lights.

Synopsis:

Downlights make good use of the directional nature of LED lighting. The products are rapidly improving, already surpassing halogen infrared technology in light output and efficacy. Some products are dimmable and produce a warm white light with good color qualities for residential use.

Products are available for new construction as well as do-it-yourself retrofits. Some types of retrofits are particularly easy to install because the retrofit kit is a self-contained unit with no removable parts and is available with GU-24 and Edison bases to fit existing sockets.

The energy savings can approach 70% to 80% when replacing incandescent technology, and nearly 50% when replacing compact fluorescent reflector lamps. Consumers need to purchase quality products and understand what the product can do in terms of light output and distribution, and how it will work if dimming is part of the application.

Energy Savings: 75%
Energy Savings Rating: Approved Measure  What's this?
LevelStatusDescription
1Concept not validatedClaims of energy savings may not be credible due to lack of documentation or validation by unbiased experts.
2Concept validated:An unbiased expert has validated efficiency concepts through technical review and calculations based on engineering principles.
3Limited assessmentAn unbiased expert has measured technology characteristics and factors of energy use through one or more tests in typical applications with a clear baseline.
4Extensive assessmentAdditional testing in relevant applications and environments has increased knowledge of performance across a broad range of products, applications, and system conditions.
5Comprehensive analysisResults of lab and field tests have been used to develop methods for reliable prediction of performance across the range of intended applications.
6Approved measureProtocols for technology application are established and approved.
Simple Payback, New Construction (years): 9.1   What's this?
Simple Payback, Retrofit (years): 16.5   What's this?

Simple Payback is one tool used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of a proposed investment, such as the investment in an energy efficient technology. Simple payback indicates how many years it will take for the initial investment to "pay itself back." The basic formula for calculating a simple payback is:

Simple Payback = Incremental First Cost / Annual Savings

The Incremental Cost is determined by subtracting the Baseline First Cost from the Measure First Cost.

For New Construction, the Baseline First Cost is the cost to purchase the standard practice technology. The Measure First Cost is the cost of the alternative, more energy efficienct technology. Installation costs are not included, as it is assumed that installation costs are approximately the same for the Baseline and the Emerging Technology.

For Retrofit scenarios, the Baseline First Cost is $0, since the baseline scenario is to leave the existing equipment in place. The Emerging Technology First Cost is the Measure First Cost plus Installation Cost (the cost of the replacement technology, plus the labor cost to install it). Retrofit scenarios generally have a higher First Cost and longer Simple Paybacks than New Construction scenarios.

Simple Paybacks are called "simple" because they do not include details such as the time value of money or inflation, and often do not include operations and maintenance (O&M) costs or end-of-life disposal costs. However, they can still provide a powerful tool for a quick assessment of a proposed measure. These paybacks are rough estimates based upon best available data, and should be treated with caution. For major financial decisions, it is suggested that a full Lifecycle Cost Analysis be performed which includes the unique details of your situation.

The energy savings estimates are based upon an electric rate of $.09/kWh, and are calculated by comparing the range of estimated energy savings to the baseline energy use. For most technologies, this results in "Typical," "Fast" and "Slow" payback estimates, corresponding with the "Typical," "High" and "Low" estimates of energy savings, respectively.

Status:

Details

LED Downlights (Can) for Residential Retrofit Applications

Downlight Lighting: LED vs. Incandescent, Halogen, CFL

Downlighting using LED technology to provide very efficient, very directional, instant-on, and often dimmable lighting to replace CFLs and incandescent lamps for “can” lights.
Item ID: 100
Sector: Residential
Energy System: Lighting--Fixtures: Indoor
Technical Advisory Group: 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)

Synopsis:

Downlights make good use of the directional nature of LED lighting. The products are rapidly improving, already surpassing halogen infrared technology in light output and efficacy. Some products are dimmable and produce a warm white light with good color qualities for residential use.

Products are available for new construction as well as do-it-yourself retrofits. Some types of retrofits are particularly easy to install because the retrofit kit is a self-contained unit with no removable parts and is available with GU-24 and Edison bases to fit existing sockets.

The energy savings can approach 70% to 80% when replacing incandescent technology, and nearly 50% when replacing compact fluorescent reflector lamps. Consumers need to purchase quality products and understand what the product can do in terms of light output and distribution, and how it will work if dimming is part of the application.

Baseline Example:

Baseline Description: 65W Halogen Recessed Can
Baseline Energy Use: 36 kWh per year per unit

Comments:

Baseline energy use calculated assuming 65W halogen source and 1.5 hr/day (546 hr/yr) of operation "Residential Lighting End-Use Consumption Study: Estimation Framework and Initial Estimates" (DOE, 2012 Pg Table 4.5, pg 4.7). 

65 W * 547 hr/yr / 1000 W/kWh = 36 kWh/yr

Manufacturer's Energy Savings Claims:

"Typical" Savings: 75%
Savings Range: From 70% to 80%

Comments:

Manufacturers claim up to 80% savings for LED downlight retrofits. Sources include RAB Lighting, Cree Lighting and Juno Lighting.

RAB Lighting: http://www.rabweb.com/retrofit.php

Cree: http://www.cree.com/lighting/products/indoor/downlights-us/lr6-series

Juno: http://www.junolightinggroup.com/product_detail.asp?ino=13670&Sel_Id=28132&brand=1

Best Estimate of Energy Savings:

"Typical" Savings: 75%
Low and High Energy Savings: 70% to 80%
Energy Savings Reliability: 6 - Approved Measure

Comments:

The energy savings can approach 70% to 80% when replacing incandescent technology, and nearly 46% to 50% when replacing compact fluorescent downlights.

Note: This is a deemed measure under the October 1, 2014 BPA "Energy Efficiency Implementation Manual".  The deemed amount is $4 to $6 per LED and $10.00 per fixture.

Energy Use of Emerging Technology:
9 kWh per unit per year What's this?

Energy Use of an Emerging Technology is based upon the following algorithm.

Baseline Energy Use - (Baseline Energy Use * Best Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings.))

Comments:

The U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE) estimates for residential ceiling fixture operation are 1.5 hr, day (548 hours per year). (DOE, 2012 Pg Table 4.5, pg 4.7) Service life ratings of LED downlights vary by product, ranging from 25,000-50,000 hours of life, per manufacturer ratings.

For comparison, incandescent parabolic aluminum reflector (PAR) lamps have lamp life of 3,000 hours and halogen HIR models (by GE) last 4,200-6,000 hours. Compact fluorescent reflector lamps last about 8,000 hours.

Technical Potential:
Units: unit
Potential number of units replaced by this technology: 12,732,000
Comments:

Based on Navigant's 2011 report for the USDOE Solid State Lighting (SSL) Program (Navigant , 2011 Pg 14), the total number of residential PAR 30, PAR 38, BR40 and BR30 lamps is 318,300,000. This report contains national data. Since the Northwest is about 4% of the population of the U.S., about 4% of the national number is used here.

Technical Potential = 4% * 318,300,000 = 12,732,000 units.

Regional Technical Potential:
0.34 TWh per year
39 aMW
What's this?

Regional Technical Potential of an Emerging Technology is calculated as follows:

Baseline Energy Use * Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings) * Technical Potential (potential number of units replaced by the Emerging Technology)

First Cost:

Installed first cost per: unit
Emerging Technology Unit Cost (Equipment Only): $40.00
Emerging Technology Installation Cost (Labor, Disposal, Etc.): $0.00
Baseline Technology Unit Cost (Equipment Only): $18.00

Comments:

Current costs for a downlight fixture with a lamp start at around $25 and go up depending on power, brand, and trim styles for housing. Costs are expected to continue to fall due to manufacturing improvements, economy of scale, and increased competition.

Costs for LED downlight retrofits were developed from an internet pricing review.

Labor costs to install the LED are assumed zero, since it is expected homeowners will be able to complete the retrofit.  The baseline technology includes a halogen PAR38 lamp.  It may be possible and more cost effective to simply replace a screw-in halogen lamp with a screw-in LED lamp but the performance won’t be quite the same.

Cost Effectiveness:

Simple payback, new construction (years): 9.1

Simple payback, retrofit (years): 16.5

What's this?

Cost Effectiveness is calculated using baseline energy use, best estimate of typical energy savings, and first cost. It does not account for factors such as impacts on O&M costs (which could be significant if product life is greatly extended) or savings of non-electric fuels such as natural gas. Actual overall cost effectiveness could be significantly different based on these other factors.

Comments:

Simple payback that doesn't reflect lamp life is a poor way to look at costs of LED downlights; it could be a few years depending on the product, hours of operation and electric rates. Life cycle costs are a much better way of looking at this technology’s cost effectiveness. The long life of the LED product means replacement lamps are not necessary for many years, solid waste is reduced, and energy savings accrue over the product’s useful life.

Detailed Description:

LED downlights are directional lamps that focus virtually all of their light downward from a recessed can fixture mounted in the ceiling. They may be self-contained lamps with integral drivers (similar to ballasts) that can be retrofitted into existing can fixtures, or dedicated fixtures designed to use LED technology from the start. Various trim kits are available to match existing décor. LED downlights are available in a warm white color that is comparable to the traditional incandescent lamp. Lamp life is listed as 25,000 to 50,000 hours, as compared to 3,000 hours for incandescent products. Many LEDs are dimmable. Products are available in a variety of beam spreads, wide to narrow. The directional nature of LEDs makes them great candidates for this application because no light is wasted by bouncing around inside the fixture. The potential for heat build-up in the fixture is an issue that must be dealt with by using properly sized and designed heat sinks, or LED life can be dramatically shortened. With 12W to 15W LED retrofits replacing 65W incandescent lamps, energy use is substantially reduced and less heat is generated. This can save additional energy in spaces that require cooling, but increases heating load and costs. A number of products in this category are listed on both the Energy Star Qualified Products for Residential LED and the USDOE LED Lighting Facts product list.

Product Information:
Cree, LR6 LED Lighting

Standard Practice:

Recessed ceiling lighting is the most commonly installed lighting fixture in residences. The fixtures are very cheap and the incandescent lamps typically used are inexpensive. They are designed to use reflector-type lamps, but are often seen with standard light bulbs or compact fluorescent spiral lamps. Downlights using traditional lamps are inefficient, with only about 50% of the light produced making its way out of the fixture. Because they have a limited distribution pattern, multiple recessed downlights are needed for general ambient lighting, controlling a significant amount of wattage with one switch. Recessed downlights are also used singly for task lighting or to highlight a feature such as an alcove or artwork.

Traditionally, halogen incandescent lamps have been installed in residential downlights. Many are controlled by dimmers, allowing light levels to be dimmed to a low level with a warm, orange glow. The heat build-up in the cans and the potential for air leakage to the attic above have prompted energy codes to specify gasketed fixtures and special insulation practices to prevent heat loss from the living space. Recently, some compact fluorescent reflector products have achieved good light output and dimming capabilities for these applications.

Development Status:

LED downlights are readily available in stores and online in rapidly increasing quantities. Cree first introduced the LED downlight with their LR6 model in 2007 at the DOE Solid State Lighting Research and Demonstration workshop. Dimmable LED downlights are now available through retailers including Home Depot and Lowes.

Commercial LED downlights have made good penetration in the market, and more and more products are becoming available for the residential sector.

The April 2013 LED Lighting Facts Product Snapshot (US DOE, 2013) showed significant maturity in both performance and availability of LED downlights. As of June 2013, over 700 LED downlights are listed in the LED Lighting Facts database. Nearly 80% of the currently listed downlights meet the ENERGY STAR® efficacy criterion for downlight luminaires. The majority of downlights have a nominal correlated color temperature (CCT) of 2700 K or 3000 K and a color rendering index (CRI) greater than 80. This warmer light reflects more prevalent use in residential and light commercial applications. Many are intended to replace halogen-lamped luminaires.

Non-Energy Benefits:

LED luminaires promise long life, and their robust design reduces lamp replacement costs. Environmental benefits include no mercury content, so disposal issues are reduced compared CFLs. LED “white” light is available in a range of color temperatures. LED sources are inherently controllable, and do not experience life degradation with frequent switching. Because no ultra-violet (UV) or infrared (IR) light is emitted to damage products or artwork, LED lamps can be particularly well-suited for retail areas and museums.  Lower lighting energy use also decreases the space cooling load and costs. 

End User Drawbacks:

High first cost has been the most significant barrier; however, prices are dropping dramatically. As of October 2014, a variety of LED downlights are available through big box stores at prices from $25 to $50, with $35 - $40 being typical.

Compatibility with existing dimmers may be a concern because not all products work with all dimmers. Point-of-purchase demonstrations of dimming quality and quantity could help allay concerns of prospective purchasers. Clear labeling that indicates which products are compatible is also important.

In many homes, recessed lighting includes multiple lamps so there can be a significant expense to retrofit a whole room at once.

Incentives to buy down the cost could help the proposed technology gain traction in the residential market, as can clear information on product selection and good warranty service.

Operations and Maintenance Costs:

Baseline Cost: $2.50 per: unit per year
Emerging Technology Cost: $0.64 per: unit per year

Comments:

LED recessed downlights are typically rated for 35,000 hours or more. Halogen lamps are rated for approximately 4,000 hours and CFLs for 8,000 hours, so significant savings in bulb replacement cost are anticipated with LED downlights.

Lamp replacement costs are calculated assuming a 35,000 hour life of the LED retrofit, a 4,000 hour life of a halogen lamp and 548 annual hours of operation.  An equivalent 0.14 halogen lamps are required annually at a cost of $2.50 ($18/lamp * 0.14 equivalent lamps/yr).  An equivalent 0.016 LED lamps are required annually at a cost of $0.64 ($40/retrofit * 0.016 equivalent lamps/yr).

Effective Life:

Anticipated Lifespan of Emerging Technology: 64 years

Comments:

USDOE estimates for residential reflector ceiling fixture operation is 548 hours per year. Service life ratings of LED downlights vary by product, ranging from 25,000-50,000 hours of life.  At 35,000 hour life, the expected lifespan of the LED is 64 years.

For comparison, incandescent parabolic aluminum reflector (PAR) lamps have lamp life of 3,000 hours and halogen HIR models (by GE) last 4,200-6,000 hours. Compact fluorescent reflector lamps last about 8,000 hours.

Competing Technologies:

Products that compete with the proposed technology include: 

  • Halogen PAR, which have replaced most of the incandescent reflector lamps as a result of 1992 EPACT
  • Halogen infrared reflector lamps
  • Compact fluorescent reflector lamps
  • Potentially the very new Electron Stimulated Luminescence (ESL) lamp

These products are compared in Table 2.2 – PAR, BR and R Shaped Lamp Installed Base, from Energy Savings Estimates of Light Emitting Diodes in Niche Applications, USDOE, page 13. (EERE, 2011 Pg 13) Test results shown in the webcast, “CALiPER Round 11 Testing,” (Paget, 2011, Pg 25) for Round 11, show that the LED product exceeds the halogen IR reflector lamp performance in light output and efficacy.

Reference and Citations:

DOE, 08/14/2014. Solid State Lighting
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy

DOE, 08/14/2014. LED Lighting Facts
U.S. Department of Energy

Navigant , 01/01/2011. Energy Savings Estimates of Light Emitting Diodes in Niche Lighting Applications
U.S. Department of Energy, Building Technologies Program
Special Notes: This report provides LED energy savings estimates in 12 markets where LEDs compete or are poised to compete with traditional lighting sources such as incandescent, halogen, HID, and certain types of fluorescent. The analysis includes general illumination, outdoor lighting, and consumer electronic display applications.

EERE, 01/18/2008. LED Application Series: Recessed Downlights
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

DOE, 07/14/2009. Energy Conservation Standards and Test Procedures for General Service Fluorescent Lamps and Incandescent Reflector Lamps: Final Rule
Federal Register, U.S. Department of Energy , 74
Special Notes: Federal Register. The effective date of this rule is September 14, 2009. Compliance with the standards established in the final rule is required starting on July 14, 2012.

Mia Paget, 02/08/2011. CALiPER Round 11 Testing
U.S. Department of Energy Solid-State Lighting

Energy Star, 10/23/2013. Commercial LED Lighting for Consumers
Energy Star

DOE, 04/01/2013. LED Lighting Facts: Snapshot Indoor Ambient Lighting
U.S. Department of Energy

DOE, 05/17/2011. Special Summary Report: Retail Replacement Lamp Testing
U.S. Department of Energy Solid-State Lighting CALiPER Program

PNNL, 07/01/2011. Demonstration Assessment of Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Retrofit Lamps, Host Site: Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon
U.S. Department of Energy

PNNL, 01/01/2012. Demonstration Assessment of Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Retrofit Lamps, Host Site: InterContinental Hotel, San Francisco, California
U.S. Department of Energy

PNNL, 11/01/2010. Demonstration Assessment of Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Accent Lighting, Host Site: Field Museum, Chicago, Illinois
U.S. Department of Energy

PNNL, 10/01/2008. Demonstration Assessment of Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Residential Downlights and Undercabinet Lights, Host Site: Lane County Tour of Homes, Eugene, Oregon
U.S. Department of Energy

PIER, 10/01/2011. Advanced LED Downlighting System
California Energy Commission’s Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program

DOE, 12/01/2012. Residential Lighting End-Use Consumption Study: Estimation Framework and Initial Estimates
U.S. Department of Energy

Rank & Scores

LED Downlights (Can) for Residential Retrofit Applications

2009 Lighting TAG (#1)


Technical Advisory Group: 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)
TAG Ranking:
Average TAG Rating:
TAG Ranking Date:
TAG Rating Commentary:

Contact
Copyright 2023 Washington State University
disclaimer and privacy policies

Bonneville Power Administration Logo