WSU Energy Program Logo
Bonneville Power Administration Logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Database
      • Browse
      • Energy Systems
        • Building Envelope
        • Electronics
        • HVAC
        • Irrigation
        • Lighting
        • Motors & Drives
        • Multiple Energy Systems
        • Power Systems
        • Process Loads & Appliances
        • Refrigeration
        • Transportation
        • Water Heating
      • Sector
        • Agricultural
        • Commercial
        • Industrial
        • Residential
        • Utility
  • TAG Portal
      • 2017 Residential Lighting TAG (#14)
      • 2016 Multifamily Building TAG (#13)
      • 2015-1 Commercial HVAC TAG (#11)
      • 2014 Residential Building TAG (#10)
      • 2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)
      • 2013 Information Technology TAG (#8)
      • 2013 ALCS TAG (#7)
      • 2012 Smart Thermostat TAG (#6)
      • 2012 LED Lighting TAG (#5)
      • 2011 Energy Management TAG (#4)
      • 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)
      • 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
      • 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)
  • Webinars
    • Webinar Archives
  • Glossary
>

Summary

Add motorized dampers to envelope duct penetrations

Building Envelope Duct Penetrations: Motorized Dampers vs. Backdraft Dampers

Motorized dampers that close automatically when an HVAC fan is turned off, saving energy by reducing infiltration.

Synopsis:

Historically, mechanical penetrations of the building envelope have been ignored in energy conservation discussions. Building codes have allowed exhaust, intake and relief air penetrations to have no dampers or non-motorized dampers. During off hours, these penetrations allow cold air to blow into the buildings, which triggers heating systems to operate more than needed. 

About 10 years ago, these penetrations and their contribution to wasting energy began receiving attention in the energy codes. At that time, larger penetrations were required to have dampers to prevent cold air from blowing into the building when the fans were not on. Currently, most energy codes require motorized dampers on all HVAC penetrations, although some code jurisdictions limit this requirement to penetrations that allow flows of over 300 cfm. Existing buildings are not required to add dampers until they undergo a major system retrofit, so many buildings do not get upgraded.

A combination of incentives and outreach is needed to make decisions makers aware of this energy-saving opportunity. This proposal is to provide such incentives to motivate retrofitting the existing building inventory with motorized dampers on the exhaust, intake and relief air penetrations.

Energy Savings: 10%
Energy Savings Rating: Comprehensive Analysis  What's this?
LevelStatusDescription
1Concept not validatedClaims of energy savings may not be credible due to lack of documentation or validation by unbiased experts.
2Concept validated:An unbiased expert has validated efficiency concepts through technical review and calculations based on engineering principles.
3Limited assessmentAn unbiased expert has measured technology characteristics and factors of energy use through one or more tests in typical applications with a clear baseline.
4Extensive assessmentAdditional testing in relevant applications and environments has increased knowledge of performance across a broad range of products, applications, and system conditions.
5Comprehensive analysisResults of lab and field tests have been used to develop methods for reliable prediction of performance across the range of intended applications.
6Approved measureProtocols for technology application are established and approved.

Status:

Details

Add motorized dampers to envelope duct penetrations

Building Envelope Duct Penetrations: Motorized Dampers vs. Backdraft Dampers

Motorized dampers that close automatically when an HVAC fan is turned off, saving energy by reducing infiltration.
Item ID: 426
Sector: Commercial
Energy System: HVAC--Air & Fluid Distribution
Technical Advisory Group: 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)

Synopsis:

Historically, mechanical penetrations of the building envelope have been ignored in energy conservation discussions. Building codes have allowed exhaust, intake and relief air penetrations to have no dampers or non-motorized dampers. During off hours, these penetrations allow cold air to blow into the buildings, which triggers heating systems to operate more than needed. 

About 10 years ago, these penetrations and their contribution to wasting energy began receiving attention in the energy codes. At that time, larger penetrations were required to have dampers to prevent cold air from blowing into the building when the fans were not on. Currently, most energy codes require motorized dampers on all HVAC penetrations, although some code jurisdictions limit this requirement to penetrations that allow flows of over 300 cfm. Existing buildings are not required to add dampers until they undergo a major system retrofit, so many buildings do not get upgraded.

A combination of incentives and outreach is needed to make decisions makers aware of this energy-saving opportunity. This proposal is to provide such incentives to motivate retrofitting the existing building inventory with motorized dampers on the exhaust, intake and relief air penetrations.

Baseline Example:

Baseline Description: Typical Commercial Building HVAC
Baseline Energy Use: 10.5 kWh per year per square foot

Comments:

The 2009 Commercial Building Stock Assessment gives the actual electrical building energy use index (EUI) for various types of heating and cooling systems (Table D-EA5).  Office buildings with electric heating and cooling have an EUI of 20.1 kWh/sf/year.  Office buildings with no electric heating or cooling use only 8.2 kWh/sf/year, indicating that the combined HVAC heating and cooling energy use is 11.9 kWh/sf/year.  For all commercial buildings, the corresponding numbers are 19.9 and 9.4 kWh/sf/year,respectively for a heating and cooling use of 10.5 kWh/sf-year.  

Since this technology can be applied to most commercial buildings, a baseline HVAC annual heating and cooling energy use of 10.5 kWh/sf/year is assumed (NEEA, 12/21/2009).

Manufacturer's Energy Savings Claims: Currently no data available.
Best Estimate of Energy Savings:

"Typical" Savings: 10%
Low and High Energy Savings: 1% to 30%
Energy Savings Reliability: 5 - Comprehensive Analysis

Comments:

Building leakage studies show about 10% to 15% loss in energy.  One of the largest penetrations of the envelope is the louvers.  In older buildings, the louvers many not have had any dampers, or if they did, they were neoprene flaps that deteriorate.  There are many sources for building leaks, but the louvered penetrations are large compared to cracks around windows and doors.

Energy Use of Emerging Technology:
9.5 kWh per square foot per year What's this?

Energy Use of an Emerging Technology is based upon the following algorithm.

Baseline Energy Use - (Baseline Energy Use * Best Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings.))

Technical Potential:
Units: square foot
Potential number of units replaced by this technology: 609,569,000
Comments:

This technology applies to existing buildings since codes require dampers for duct penetrations for new construction. The technology also applies to larger buildings with centralized HVAC plants that have duct envelope penetrations. It would not apply to
packaged rooftop units.

Estimates are based on preliminary updated numbers from the 2013 update to the Commercial Building Stock Assessment (CBSA)
using the estimates for 2014 ( see Ecotope, Inc., 01/01/2014). Using market shares from the CBSA (see NEEA, 2009) - the percentage of commercial space that is conditioned (85%), and served by chillers and water loop heat pumps (23%) results in: 3,118,000,000 * 0.85 * 0.23 = 609,569,000.

Regional Technical Potential:
0.64 TWh per year
73 aMW
What's this?

Regional Technical Potential of an Emerging Technology is calculated as follows:

Baseline Energy Use * Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings) * Technical Potential (potential number of units replaced by the Emerging Technology)

First Cost: Currently no data available.

Cost Effectiveness:

Simple payback, new construction (years): N/A

Simple payback, retrofit (years): N/A

What's this?

Cost Effectiveness is calculated using baseline energy use, best estimate of typical energy savings, and first cost. It does not account for factors such as impacts on O&M costs (which could be significant if product life is greatly extended) or savings of non-electric fuels such as natural gas. Actual overall cost effectiveness could be significantly different based on these other factors.

Reference and Citations:

W Jiang, 09/28/2009. Technical Support Document: 50% Energy Savings Design Technology Packages for Highway Lodging Buildings
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

State of Oregon, 12/12/2011. 2010 Oregon Energy Efficiency Specialty Code Section 503.2.4.5
State of Oregon Building Codes Division

CADMUS, 12/21/2009. Northwest Commercial Building Stock Assessment (CBSA): Final Report
Prepared by the CADMUS Group for the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance

xx, 09/01/2015. xx
xx

Rank & Scores

Add motorized dampers to envelope duct penetrations

2010 HVAC TAG (#3)


Technical Advisory Group: 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)
TAG Ranking:
Average TAG Rating:
TAG Ranking Date:
TAG Rating Commentary:

Contact
Copyright 2023 Washington State University
disclaimer and privacy policies

Bonneville Power Administration Logo