WSU Energy Program Logo
Bonneville Power Administration Logo
  • Home
  • About
  • Database
      • Browse
      • Energy Systems
        • Building Envelope
        • Electronics
        • HVAC
        • Irrigation
        • Lighting
        • Motors & Drives
        • Multiple Energy Systems
        • Power Systems
        • Process Loads & Appliances
        • Refrigeration
        • Transportation
        • Water Heating
      • Sector
        • Agricultural
        • Commercial
        • Industrial
        • Residential
        • Utility
  • TAG Portal
      • 2017 Residential Lighting TAG (#14)
      • 2016 Multifamily Building TAG (#13)
      • 2015-1 Commercial HVAC TAG (#11)
      • 2014 Residential Building TAG (#10)
      • 2014 Commercial Building TAG (#9)
      • 2013 Information Technology TAG (#8)
      • 2013 ALCS TAG (#7)
      • 2012 Smart Thermostat TAG (#6)
      • 2012 LED Lighting TAG (#5)
      • 2011 Energy Management TAG (#4)
      • 2010 HVAC TAG (#3)
      • 2009 HVAC TAG (#2)
      • 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)
  • Webinars
    • Webinar Archives
  • Glossary
>

Summary

LED Elevator Lighting

Elevator Lighting: LED vs. Incandescent or Fluorescent

LED lighting specifically designed for elevator applications, with particular focus on low profile form factors and durable designs to withstand vibration.

Synopsis:

Elevator lighting is an application where LED products are becoming broadly available.  LEDs are particularly suited for elevator applications because their rugged design can withstand the vibrations and motions of the cabin.  Also, because of the inherent directionality of LED light sources, elevator lighting is a good application for LED sources. 

A field study conducted by the Lighting Research Center (LRC) demonstrated that LEDs can be effective, energy-saving alternatives to incandescent downlights in elevators. The field installation showed an energy savings of 45 percent compared with the original incandescent lights. The long life of 40,000 hours also means LEDs compare favorably with the 2,500 hour lifespan of traditional incandescent products. Additionally, the U.S. Department of Energy (US DOE) is encouraging research, development and market penetration of LED lighting, and is providing resources which provide objective, frequently updated information about the technology.   

Energy savings over traditional elevator lighting using incandescent sources may be significant; 45 - 60% savings can be achieved depending on design light levels and fixture efficiency. Lamp life could be significantly longer than for other systems in use, potentially providing maintenance savings. The white light is available in a range of color temperatures and high Color Rendering Index (CRI) levels suitable for architectural lighting uses.  Light distribution can be precisely controlled in well-designed luminaires by taking advantage of the inherent directionality of LED sources.  Additionally, the DOE predicts continued improvement in efficiency and decline in price for LED lighting.

Energy Savings: 45%
Energy Savings Rating: Extensive Assessment  What's this?
LevelStatusDescription
1Concept not validatedClaims of energy savings may not be credible due to lack of documentation or validation by unbiased experts.
2Concept validated:An unbiased expert has validated efficiency concepts through technical review and calculations based on engineering principles.
3Limited assessmentAn unbiased expert has measured technology characteristics and factors of energy use through one or more tests in typical applications with a clear baseline.
4Extensive assessmentAdditional testing in relevant applications and environments has increased knowledge of performance across a broad range of products, applications, and system conditions.
5Comprehensive analysisResults of lab and field tests have been used to develop methods for reliable prediction of performance across the range of intended applications.
6Approved measureProtocols for technology application are established and approved.

Status:

Details

LED Elevator Lighting

Elevator Lighting: LED vs. Incandescent or Fluorescent

LED lighting specifically designed for elevator applications, with particular focus on low profile form factors and durable designs to withstand vibration.
Item ID: 134
Sector: Commercial
Energy System: Lighting--Fixtures: Indoor
Technical Advisory Group: 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)

Synopsis:

Elevator lighting is an application where LED products are becoming broadly available.  LEDs are particularly suited for elevator applications because their rugged design can withstand the vibrations and motions of the cabin.  Also, because of the inherent directionality of LED light sources, elevator lighting is a good application for LED sources. 

A field study conducted by the Lighting Research Center (LRC) demonstrated that LEDs can be effective, energy-saving alternatives to incandescent downlights in elevators. The field installation showed an energy savings of 45 percent compared with the original incandescent lights. The long life of 40,000 hours also means LEDs compare favorably with the 2,500 hour lifespan of traditional incandescent products. Additionally, the U.S. Department of Energy (US DOE) is encouraging research, development and market penetration of LED lighting, and is providing resources which provide objective, frequently updated information about the technology.   

Energy savings over traditional elevator lighting using incandescent sources may be significant; 45 - 60% savings can be achieved depending on design light levels and fixture efficiency. Lamp life could be significantly longer than for other systems in use, potentially providing maintenance savings. The white light is available in a range of color temperatures and high Color Rendering Index (CRI) levels suitable for architectural lighting uses.  Light distribution can be precisely controlled in well-designed luminaires by taking advantage of the inherent directionality of LED sources.  Additionally, the DOE predicts continued improvement in efficiency and decline in price for LED lighting.

Baseline Example:

Baseline Description: 50 W incandescent
Baseline Energy Use: 438 kWh per year per unit

Comments:

This estimate came from: http://www.lrc.rpi.edu/resources/news/enews/Jul05/general259.html. It assumes 50W * 24 hr/day *365 days/year.  Note, however, that some elevators are equipped with fluorescent tubes with diffusers while newer models are often equipped with cab occupancy sensors. 

Manufacturer's Energy Savings Claims: Currently no data available.
Best Estimate of Energy Savings:

"Typical" Savings: 45%
Energy Savings Reliability: 4 - Extensive Assessment

Comments:

A study by the LRC examined an elevator with six 50 W incandescent downlights.  The recommended replacement was a recessed fixture with six 3 W Luxeon LEDs per downlight (27.5 W total when ballast losses are included).  The total lighting load for the cab was reduced from 300 W to only 165 W.  This approach yields an energy savings of  45% (LRC, 2005).

Energy Use of Emerging Technology:
240.9 kWh per unit per year What's this?

Energy Use of an Emerging Technology is based upon the following algorithm.

Baseline Energy Use - (Baseline Energy Use * Best Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings.))

Technical Potential:
Units: unit
Potential number of units replaced by this technology: 216,000
Comments:

According to the National Elevator Industry, Inc., there are 900,000 elevators in the U.S (NEII, 2014). If we take 4% of that, assuming the number of elevators is proportional to the population, that equals approximately 36,000 elevators in the Northwest. During the time that most existing elevators were installed, the dominant technology has been hydraulic.  Assume that each elevator is equipped with six 50 W downlights that can be replaced with LEDs.  The total number of 50 W incandescent lights to be replaced is thus 216,000. 

Regional Technical Potential:
0.04 TWh per year
5 aMW
What's this?

Regional Technical Potential of an Emerging Technology is calculated as follows:

Baseline Energy Use * Estimate of Energy Savings (either Typical savings OR the high range of savings) * Technical Potential (potential number of units replaced by the Emerging Technology)

First Cost: Currently no data available.

Cost Effectiveness:

Simple payback, new construction (years): N/A

Simple payback, retrofit (years): N/A

What's this?

Cost Effectiveness is calculated using baseline energy use, best estimate of typical energy savings, and first cost. It does not account for factors such as impacts on O&M costs (which could be significant if product life is greatly extended) or savings of non-electric fuels such as natural gas. Actual overall cost effectiveness could be significantly different based on these other factors.

Reference and Citations:

LRC, 07/19/2005. LED Elevator Downlight Benefits
Lighting Research Center

LRC, 01/01/2014. Low-Profile LED Fixtures for Elevators
Lighting Research Center

Jennifer Taylor, 07/12/2005. Elevator lighting gets an upgrade with LEDs
Lighting Research Center

BOMA, 01/01/2013. Calculating Return on Investment for Energy Projects
Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) Silicon Valley

Rank & Scores

LED Elevator Lighting

2009 Lighting TAG (#1)


Technical Advisory Group: 2009 Lighting TAG (#1)
TAG Ranking:
Average TAG Rating:
TAG Ranking Date:
TAG Rating Commentary:

Contact
Copyright 2023 Washington State University
disclaimer and privacy policies

Bonneville Power Administration Logo